Spletno mesto uporablja piškotke, da vam lahko zagotovimo najboljšo možno uporabniško izkušnjo. Podatki o piškotkih se shranijo v vašem brskalniku in izvajajo funkcije, kot so prepoznavanje, ko se vrnete na naše spletno mesto, in pomaga naši ekipi, da razume, kateri deli spletnega mesta se vam zdijo najbolj zanimivi in koristni.
Ko obiščete našo stran, se nekatere informacije shranjujejo, ki so načeloma anonimne, in se načeloma ne nanašajo na vašo indentiteto. To so sledeče podrobnosti.
- vaš IP ali proxy IP serverja
- osnovne informacije o domeni
- vaš internetni ponudnik včasih shranjuje zadeve, odvisno od konfiguracij vaše povezave.
- datum in ura vašega obiska strani
- dolžina vašega obiska
- strani katere ste dostopali
- mesečni dostop do strani
- velikost dostopanega dokumenta
- stran s katere ste prišli do naše strani
- operacijski sistem katerega uporabljate
- Občasno lahko uporabljamo oglase za tretje osebe, ki prikazujejo oglase na podlagi predhodnih obiskov nekaterih spletnih mest. Te oglaševalske družbe uporabljajo piškotke za anonimno zbiranje podatkov.
The newest Iowa statute doesn’t be seemingly designed following federal statute
However when a national supply is a lot like a supply inside the the latest Iowa law, federal judge interpretations are of help from inside the construing this new Iowa law. Hall v. Broadlawns Med. Ctr., 811 N.W.2d 478, 483-84 (Iowa 2012) (looking at a couple of federal times interpreting “the levels to which a statute protects confidentiality regardless if documents come in your hands out of third parties); City of Riverdale v. Diercks, 806 Letter.W.2d 643, 658 (Iowa 2011) (agreeing with a national court that talked about https://datingranking.net/omegle-review/ choosy disclosure); Details Custodian, Atlantic Cmty. Sch. , 818 N.W.2d within 238 (using the balancing shot used by government courts so you’re able to harmony “anyone hobbies prepared by disclosure against the private passion within the protecting confidentiality”).
dos. Dialogue of any exception
(1) An excellent student’s label and target in public information regarding the custody off a public school is not, yet not, private. 80 Op. Att’y Gen. 720 (Summer 18, 1980). Cf. 20 U.S.C. § 1232g (college or university need certainly to make it moms and dads possible opportunity to revision college they do not require this article put-out in place of early in the day concur). Select including Iowa Password § twenty-two.9 (arrangements of Chapter 22 that will produce assertion out of federal money are suspended on the quantity must avoid denial).
(2) “We think an effective subpoena is a sufficient court order less than point twenty two.7(1) so that a celebration to track down arms of records to let a courtroom a way to evaluate their relevancy and you can materiality.” Poole v. Hawkeye Urban area Cmty. Step Program, Inc., 666 Letter.W.2d 560 (Iowa 2003) (subpoena served for the college or university district for student suggestions in occupant step up against landlord alleging exposure to head toxicity).
(3) Significantly less than FERPA and you may in line with U.S. Agency regarding Education guidelines, “academic facts are withheld within entirety where in fact the requester carry out if not know the identity of one’s referenced beginner[(s)] . . . even with redactions.” Press-Citizen Co. v. Univ. away from Iowa, 817 N.W.2d 480, 492 (Iowa 2012).
Dist
(4) Information when you look at the confidential professionals ideas revealing sex, home address, or beginning day are private information that needs to be leftover private less than it part. Clymer v. Town of Cedar Rapids, 601 N.W.2d 42, forty two (Iowa 1999).
(5) Disciplinary recommendations and you may employment efficiency info try excused off revelation and you will qualify as the private information within the private staff info. In the morning. Civil Rights Commitment First step toward Iowa, Inc. v. Records Caretaker, Atlantic Cmty. Sch. , 818 Letter.W.2d 231, 232 (Iowa 2012); De l’ensemble des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. v. Des Moines Check in Tribune Co., 487 Letter.W.2d 666, 670 (Iowa 1992).
(6) The amount of unwell leave and vacation exit used by private societal teams are a matter of legitimate question toward societal and cannot getting leftover confidential. Clymer v. Town of Cedar Rapids, 601 N.W.2d 42, 44 (Iowa 1999).